Executive summary

Global Capability Centers, often called GCCs, are no longer just back-office support hubs. Over the past five years, they have expanded rapidly in both size and strategic importance. Today, enterprise-owned offshore and nearshore centers are handling product engineering, advanced analytics, cybersecurity, and AI-enabled transformation.

Research shows that new GCC launches remain strong worldwide, with estimates ranging from roughly 300 to more than 600 new centers annually, depending on how they are counted. At the same time, the provider supported segment, which includes setup, run, transformation, and build operate, transfer, or hybrid models, has grown into a multi-billion-dollar market projected to expand quickly through 2027. ^[2]

A major driver of this growth is India. ^[3] A widely cited five year landscape report estimates that India reached more than 1,700 GCCs by fiscal year 2024, up from over 1,285 in fiscal year 2019. The same report highlights a sharp rise in advanced digital capabilities, with adoption of AI, machine learning, and data science increasing from about 65% to roughly 86% over that period. ^[4] Industry commentary frequently places India’s GCC export revenue at approximately 64.6 billion US dollars in fiscal 2024, with projections reaching around 99 to 105 billion US dollars by 2030. ^[5] These numbers reinforce how central GCCs have become to global operating models.

For the Philippines, the GCC and captive model is not a side story. It directly intersects with the country’s globally significant IT BPM sector. Industry figures commonly cite the Philippine IT BPM industry at around 38 billion US dollars in revenue and approximately 1.8 million jobs in 2024. ^[6] This scale explains why the Philippines remains a leading global delivery location, particularly in customer experience and selected knowledge services.

Importantly, the Philippines already has a meaningful in-house or captive footprint. A major industry roadmap estimates that the global in-house center market in the country accounted for about 220,000 full-time equivalents and roughly 7 billion US dollars in revenue in 2022. ^[7] GCCs are therefore not new to the Philippine ecosystem. They are an established and growing segment within the broader IT BPM economy.

The real implication for Philippine outsourcing is not that GCCs will replace traditional BPO providers. Instead, the basis of competition is shifting in three clear ways. First, from labor-driven voice services toward higher value, digitally enabled work. Second, from vendor-only models toward hybrid ecosystems that combine enterprise GCCs, specialist providers, and automation platforms. Third, from headcount growth as the main metric to productivity per employee, as AI reduces routine work and raises the bar for skills.

Global workforce research suggests that AI will both create and displace jobs through 2030. At the same time, reporting on real-world deployments shows that automation in customer service can materially reduce demand for routine agent roles. Entry-level, voice-heavy segments are most exposed unless work is redesigned toward higher value tasks.  ^[8]

Strategically, Philippine stakeholders should view GCC expansion in three ways. It is a direct investment opportunity. It is a catalyst for third-party providers to move further up the value chain. And it is a clear signal that policy, talent development, and digital infrastructure must evolve. Priority areas should include stable and transparent incentives, workable hybrid and remote frameworks for export enterprises, stronger data privacy and compliance maturity, resilient digital infrastructure, and accelerated skills conversion into analytics, engineering, cloud, cybersecurity, and AI operations. ^[9]

Definitions and distinctions

GCC (Global Capability Center)

A GCC is usually described as a strategic offshore or nearshore unit built to support global operations through talent, technology, and innovation. It is not just there to process transactions.  ^[10] In today’s market, the label “GCC” often means higher-value work like digital product engineering, platform and cloud operations, analytics and AI, cybersecurity, and R&D support. This is a shift from the older shared services or back office framing. ^[11]

Captive / shared services center

“Going captive” generally means the company keeps shared services in-house, whether the center is onshore or offshore. The enterprise owns day-to-day management and holds full governance control. This model is often chosen when control is the priority, especially around sensitive data, IP, compliance, and internal quality standards. ^[12] In practice, the terms “captive,” “GIC” (global in-house center), and “GCC” overlap a lot. The difference is often less about ownership and more about what the center is built to do. A mature captive with advanced digital mandates is often described as a GCC. ^[13]

Third‑party BPO (outsourced services)

A third-party BPO model means the company delegates specific processes to an external provider under contracts and SLAs. This can include customer experience, finance and accounting, HR operations, and IT services. From a cost perspective, pricing usually includes the provider’s operating overhead and margin. From a control perspective, governance is shared. That means process boundaries, data access, and IP protections need to be designed intentionally, then enforced through practical controls and day-to-day management, not just contract language.

Here is a quick table that illustrates these differences:

Attribute comparison table

Provider-supported GCC setup is now firmly mainstream. Instead of building everything from scratch, many enterprises work with a specialist provider to design, launch, and in some cases temporarily run the center.

Analyst research commonly highlights three support models. Assisted, joint venture, and build-operate-transfer or BOT. In an assisted model, the enterprise retains ownership while the provider helps with setup, hiring, compliance, and early-stage operations. In a joint venture, ownership and risk are shared between the enterprise and the local partner. In a BOT structure, the provider builds and operates the center for a defined period, then transfers full ownership and control to the enterprise. ^[14]

These approaches can significantly shorten the time to launch, especially for companies entering a new country for the first time. They reduce early-stage friction around site selection, regulatory navigation, talent acquisition, and local vendor management.

However, they also introduce new layers of complexity. Enterprises need clear transition plans from day one. They must understand where operational knowledge sits during the operate phase, how dependency on the provider is managed, and what practical steps will ensure clean knowledge transfer at handover. Without deliberate design, the benefits of speed can be offset by transition risk later on.

Global growth drivers and recent trends

Since around 2020, a pretty consistent set of forces has pushed more enterprises toward GCCs and captive models.

Digital talent scarcity and the “insource to transform” logic

A recurring argument in enterprise globalization research is that firms are simultaneously managing layoffs in some geographies while facing shortages in critical digital skills; this pushes companies to build “talent engines” in global hubs. One consulting survey cited in a GCC location analysis reports 77% of companies insourced previously outsourced IT functions, explicitly linking insourcing to control, quality, IP, speed/agility, and customer service outcomes. ^[15]

Resilience and multi-hub risk management

The pandemic normalized distributed operating models, and geopolitical disruption has made concentration risk much harder to ignore. As a result, more enterprises are moving toward multi-hub strategies as a business continuity requirement, not an optional optimization. The same location analysis explicitly connects dispersed workforces and geopolitical tensions to multi-hub approaches designed to reduce operational risk. ^[16]

Provider-enabled acceleration

GCC expansion is no longer synonymous with slow greenfield builds. Analyst commentary observes that, in recent years, a large share of new centers are provider-assisted or set up via BOT/hybrid models, enabling faster market entry but creating execution and transition risks if the “handover” is poorly designed. ^[17]

Market formation around GCC setup & transformation services

As provider support becomes standard, a clearer services market is forming around GCC setup, operations, transformation, and more complex events like carve-outs or divestitures. A 2025 PEAK Matrix style assessment describes this “provider-supported GCC market” and projects it to double from roughly $20 billion USD in 2024 to about $40 billion USD by 2027. It also expects the transformation segment to grow the fastest, which aligns with the broader trend of GCCs taking on higher-value work, and not just expanding headcount.  ^[18]

Recent inflection points in the GCC and captive landscape

The last five to seven years have not been a gradual evolution. They represent a series of clear inflection points that reshaped how enterprises think about global operating models.

Geographic shifts across APAC

The most important geographic shift in APAC is not a mass relocation from one country to another, but a portfolio rebalancing. India continues to dominate on scale and engineering depth. At the same time, Southeast Asian hubs are being positioned for diversification, customer experience strength, and specific functional clusters. Enterprises are not choosing one country. They are building multi-hub portfolios.

India

India remains the anchor of the global GCC ecosystem. A five-year landscape summary shows India adding more than 400 new GCCs and over 1,100 new GCC units in the last five years. The installed base is estimated at more than 1,700 GCCs by fiscal year 2024. Importantly, there is a visible shift toward more mature portfolio and transformation hub stages rather than basic delivery centers. ^[24] Market narratives also place India’s GCC revenues at around 64.6 billion US dollars in fiscal 2024, with projections reaching roughly $99 to $105 billion USD by 2030. ^[25]

Philippines

The Philippines already holds structural weight in global services. A national industry roadmap positions it as the second-largest global IT BPM delivery location by headcount share. The same roadmap estimates the local global in-house center market at approximately 220,000 full-time equivalents and around 7 billion US dollars in revenue in 2022. That confirms that captive and GCC operations are not new to the country. ^[26] Recent macro analysis reinforces the sector’s importance to the broader economy and notes that AI will put pressure on lower complexity work while rewarding higher value service lines. ^[27]

For the Philippines, the opportunity is not to replicate India’s engineering scale. It is to build on existing strengths in customer experience and domain-aligned services, then selectively expand into digital mandates where mid-scale hubs can thrive.

Malaysia

Malaysia continues to market itself as a high‑value global business services (GBS) hub. A major location index press release keeps Malaysia among the top global destinations for services location attractiveness, alongside India and China. ^[28] Malaysian reporting on GBS strategy emphasizes moving up the value chain through automation and AI. ^[29]

Vietnam

Recent market reporting (citing Savills) frames Ho Chi Minh City as a destination for “next-generation” GCCs, with demand tied to technology, R&D, data, and innovation rather than pure cost takeout. ^[30]

Singapore

In APAC operating models, Singapore is often emphasized for regional treasury, governance, and tax/regulatory stability rather than massive headcount-scale delivery. ^[31]

Key inference for Philippine stakeholders

The Philippines is unlikely to outdo India in engineering scale. That is not the realistic battleground.

Where the country can compete effectively is by coupling three strengths.

1. Leadership in customer experience delivery.
2. Domain-aligned knowledge services in sectors such as healthcare, banking, and financial services operations.
3. Select digital hubs in analytics, cloud operations, cybersecurity, and AI operations that can perform strongly at mid-scale.

When these are paired with governance credibility, incentives clarity, and stable policy signals, the Philippines becomes a logical component of multi-hub resilience strategies. That positioning aligns with both national industry roadmaps and the broader global move toward diversified operating portfolios. ^[32]

Industry adoption patterns and technology trajectory

Across APAC, GCC adoption is no longer confined to “tech companies.” The most consistent sector patterns are:

BFSI as a flagship GCC vertical

Banking, financial services, and insurance are still the clearest GCC anchor industries in APAC. Real estate and market analyses repeatedly point to BFSI as a major driver of GCC expansion in India’s office markets, with BFSI taking a large share of GCC leasing activity. ^[33] In the Philippines, BFSI is also described as the largest segment supported by the country within the broader IT‑BPM economy. ^[34] In practice, that typically translates into a mix of customer operations, back office processes, and increasingly more knowledge-heavy functions tied to compliance, fraud operations, and digital service support.

Healthcare and life sciences

Healthcare and pharma firms have expanded shared services and technology centers across APAC, often combining transactional service hubs with data/IT buildouts. ^[35] That can include analytics support, platform operations, and security functions, depending on the enterprise’s maturity and regulatory posture.

Retail/CPG and manufacturing

Large retailers and CPG companies have increasingly opened GCCs focused on technology and analytics, often in India but with growing interest in multi-location footprints. ^[36]

Technology adoption inside GCCs

Two survey-based signals matter for labor demand:

1) Digital technology penetration is rising inside GCCs.

India-focused GCC research shows a marked rise in the adoption of advanced capabilities (AI/ML & data science, cybersecurity, and blockchain). This means that even as automation reduces routine tasks, demand for higher skill roles inside GCCs continues to expand.  ^[37]

2) AI/automation and data capabilities are core GCC priorities.

A GCC pulse survey reports notable engagement in AI/ML, natural language processing, RPA, cybersecurity, and analytics, reinforcing that modern GCC roadmaps assume substantial automation plus new digital delivery roles. ^[38]

Impact on labor demand

The labor demand story is bifurcated:

• Routine, scriptable work is the most exposed. Global workforce research finds that a substantial share of employers expect to reduce roles where AI can automate tasks. At the same time, reporting on live deployments shows chatbots handling a large portion of routine customer experience queries in some operations. That reduces demand for large call center workforces unless roles are redesigned toward higher-value functions. ^[39]
• New roles expand around AI operations and risk management. Workforce projections anticipate both job creation and job displacement through 2030. The net effect depends heavily on how quickly companies and countries reskill their talent pools. Entry-level pipelines that once fed voice and transactional roles need to convert into AI-enabled service roles such as quality assurance, conversation design, compliance review, escalation handling, AI training data support, and model monitoring. ^[40]

For the Philippines, the practical implication is that voice-heavy growth math becomes less reliable over time, while hybrid human and AI CX and knowledge/digital services become the defensible growth paths. ^[41]

Comparative quantitative analysis vs Philippine third‑party BPOs

This section compares GCC/captive models with third‑party BPO delivery from a Philippine vantage point. Where “exact” benchmarks are not publicly standardized, ranges are provided from reputable labor-market datasets and surveys, and the limitations are explicitly noted.

Sourcing mix and scale context

A national industry roadmap estimates that, globally, service providers still account for the majority of offshore/nearshore delivery headcount (roughly 75–80%), while global in-house centers account for ~20–25%, meaning captives/GCCs are large enough to reshape competition but not so large as to eliminate the provider market. ^[42]

Within the Philippines, the same roadmap estimates the local GIC market at ~220k FTEs and ~US$7B revenue (2022), large enough that “Philippines outsourcing” already includes a significant captive component. ^[43]

Salary bands as a proxy for cost and capability mix

Public salary intelligence is imperfect (it reflects posted jobs and self-reported data), but it is still a useful directional comparator for “what kinds of work are being hired.”

Sources: Jobstreet Philippines salary guides for these roles. ^[44]

GCC expansions tend to bid for the mid-to-high end of this spectrum (especially data/engineering roles). That raises wage pressure and retention competition for providers, but also creates a larger “skills market” that can benefit the Philippines if the education-to-employment pipeline can scale beyond entry-level voice roles. ^[45]

Attrition

Public reporting suggests Philippine contact center attrition remains elevated. One industry association leader cited voluntary attrition in the ~25–30% range in 2023 after higher levels in 2022. ^[46]

By contrast, a GCC survey focused on India reports an average attrition rate ~12.5%, with most centers between 5% and 15%, suggesting that—at least in some GCC contexts—employer value propositions, role mix, and career paths can reduce churn relative to high-volume contact centers. ^[47]

For Philippine BPO providers, competing against GCCs is not purely about wage matching; it is about (1) role enrichment, (2) internal mobility into analytics/automation tracks, and (3) building “career architecture” that historically has been stronger in captives than in high-volume CX. ^[48]

Time-to-scale and setup speed

Time-to-scale is rarely published as a standardized benchmark, but provider-supported models demonstrate that “GCC setup” can be fast when enterprises accept assisted/JV/BOT structures. In a provider assessment report, one assisted model case describes setting up an in-house center in ~12 weeks in Hyderabad (India). ^[49]

At the same time, analyst commentary cautions that BOT transitions can have “hidden complexity” (leadership, HR localization, facilities readiness, and knowledge/tooling transfer issues) that can slow real business outcomes if underestimated. ^[50]

Philippine third‑party providers can retain their historic advantage in speed-to-start, but increasingly need to offer GCC‑adjacent services (setup support, pilot-to-transfer, managed “captive-like” pods, and transformation governance) to stay embedded when clients favor insourcing. ^[51]

Indicative productivity proxy

Revenue-per-FTE is an imperfect proxy (especially for captives operating cost-plus), but it is one of the few accessible quantitative lenses.

• Philippines IT‑BPM (2024): US$38B / ~1.82M jobs ≈ US$20.9k revenue per job. ^[52]
• Philippines GIC market (2022): ~US$7B / ~220k FTE ≈ US$31.8k per FTE (bearing in mind transfer-pricing effects). ^[53]
• India GCC reference point: US$64.6B / ~1.9M employees ≈ US$34.0k per employee (often cited for fiscal 2024). ^[54]

Captive/GCC footprints frequently correlate with higher-skilled work mixes and, directionally, higher economic intensity per worker. The Philippine opportunity is to increase the share of work that looks like the second line (knowledge/digital) rather than being concentrated in routine tiers. ^[55]

Case studies from APAC

This set of cases is intentionally cross‑sector and uses primary company announcements and credible reporting where available.

Boehringer Ingelheim[46] shared services expansion in the Philippines

A 2022 report describes Boehringer Ingelheim’s shared services center in the Philippines as having grown from ~50 employees to ~500, with plans to expand headcount further and add service scope (HR learning services, benefits administration, travel & expense, and broader geographic coverage). ^[56]

(1) The Philippines can host more than voice/CX; shared services can accumulate scope over time.

(2) “Beyond back office” expansion depends on process standardization and platform consolidation—explicitly linked to a multi‑year transformation roadmap. ^[57]

Airbnb’s ^[58] technology hub investment in India

Airbnb announced a Bengaluru technology hub intended to create local skilled jobs, with initial plans for “a few hundred” roles and future expansion, explicitly framed as part of long-term investment and access to top tech talent. ^[59]

(1) Many “GCCs” now launch as tech hubs (not back offices).

(2) The first wave is often engineering-heavy, which raises the bar for talent ecosystems and for employer branding. ^[60]

Henkel^[61] Global Technology Center in India

Henkel’s 2022 announcement positions its Global Technology Center as a mechanism to accelerate digital innovation, pursue insourcing of digital skills, and improve agility and speed-to-market. ^[62] An accompanying narrative on the creation story states that the center moved from concept (early 2021) to launch (April 2022) and scaled to 200+ people by end‑2022. ^[63]

(1) The compelling GCC story is increasingly “innovation throughput” rather than labor arbitrage.

(2) Execution speed matters but requires strong location ecosystem support and internal global collaboration models. ^[64]

Costco Wholesale^[65] GCC setup in India

Credible reporting indicates Costco planned its first technology center in India (Hyderabad), envisioned as a GCC handling technology and research operations, with ~1,000 initial employees and a scale-up path. ^[66]

(1) New GCC entrants continue to choose India for first-wave tech centers, reinforcing competitive pressure on other geographies for pure engineering scale.

(2) For other APAC hubs (including the Philippines), differentiation must lean on domain/CX excellence, risk diversification, and targeted digital skill clusters rather than “generalist engineering at India scale.” ^[67]

ERGO Group[58] GCC build in India

A case narrative reports ERGO’s decision to establish a GCC in Mumbai in early 2022 to access talent at an attractive cost level for a digital agenda, with the captive technology hub described as covering IT/ITES, KPO, and digital services for the broader group; the center is reported at ~550 employees and noted as hiring faster than initial plans. ^[68]

(1) “Digital agenda” is now a primary driver for establishing captives.

(2) Faster-than-planned hiring is possible in mature ecosystems but can amplify leadership and governance bottlenecks if not planned early. ^[69]

Strategic implications for Philippine stakeholders

This section translates GCC/captive growth into actionable implications for Philippine BPO firms, policymakers, talent leaders, and investors.

Incentives, hybrid work, and compliance

CREATE MORE Act and hybrid work rules. The enhanced incentives environment matters because GCCs are long-horizon investments. A widely circulated summary of Republic Act No. 12066 (CREATE MORE Act) states that registered business enterprises may institute telecommuting/WFH programs not covering more than 50% of the total workforce, subject to implementing agency rules. ^[70] A major business publication reported that PEZA planned to allow up to 50% WFH for registered businesses, reinforcing that hybrid policy is now part of competitiveness. ^[71]

Data privacy and trust-as-infrastructure. The Data Privacy Act framework applies broadly to personal information processing and explicitly covers controllers/processors, including outsourcing arrangements with subcontracted processing, making privacy control design and incident response maturity central for both GCCs and BPOs. ^[72]

Implications and recommendations

For the Philippine third‑party BPO firms

Focus for the next 12–24 months should be “defend and extend”: defend core CX while extending into GCC-adjacent, higher-value streams.

• Build hybrid human+AI CX offerings (conversation design, QA, escalation teams, trust & safety, compliance review) to offset routine volume reduction. ^[73]
• Productize GCC enablement: set up support, pilot pods, managed “captive-like” teams, and BOT-style transitions where appropriate, because provider-assisted builds are now mainstream. ^[74]
• Drive down attrition structurally by creating role mobility ladders (CSR → analyst ops → automation ops), since attrition is a compounding cost disadvantage in high-volume programs. ^[75]

For policymakers and industry bodies

• Treat GCC attraction as a portfolio strategy: target sectors where the Philippines has a credible edge (CX excellence, BFSI ops, healthcare services, multilingual regional support) while selectively incubating engineering/digital hubs. ^[76]
• Maintain incentives clarity and administrative execution under CREATE MORE, including predictable rules for hybrid work and export treatment, because GCCs are sensitive to “policy whiplash.” ^[77]
• Strengthen privacy enforcement capacity and breach response norms to support higher-trust workloads (regulated data, financial crime ops, health claims analytics). ^[78]

For talent development stakeholders

• Rebuild entry-level pathways: if routine CX is increasingly automated, then entry programs must include data literacy, AI-enabled QA, and process redesign—not just communication skills. ^[79]
• Scale the “skills conversion engine” in partnership with employers, because the wage gradient between entry-level CX and data/engineering roles is large and will continue to widen. ^[80]

For investors and real estate/infra ecosystems

• Expect demand to shift toward higher-spec, resilient infrastructure (connectivity redundancy, cybersecurity compliance, modern collaboration environments), consistent with “next-generation” GCC requirements reported in emerging hubs. ^[81]
• The investable theme is “productivity + reliability,” not just office space volume—particularly if hybrid work caps and operating models keep evolving. ^[82]

Risk mitigation checklist for Philippine stakeholders

• Automation shock absorption: identify processes where AI can automate 30–70% of task volume and redesign roles toward exception handling and revenue protection. ^[83]
• Location concentration risk: diversify within the Philippines (multi-site, resilient telecom/power) and strengthen disaster recovery discipline for both captives and providers. ^[84]
• Policy and compliance risk: maintain strict privacy-by-design and audit readiness; align hybrid work with incentive eligibility and export rules. ^[85]

GCC growth is not merely a competitive threat; it is also a capability upgrade path for Philippine outsourcing. The winners will be those who can convert the Philippines’ scale advantage in CX and services into a credible position in AI-enabled operations, analytics, and domain-led knowledge services while using policy stability and trust/compliance maturity as differentiators. ^[86]

References

[1] (also cited as [15], [16])
Zinnov. (2023). COE hotspots of the world 2023: GCC setup location analysis report.
https://zinnov.com/global-capability-center-setup-location-analysis-2023-report/

[2] (also cited as [11], [18], [19], [51], [58])
Everest Group. (2025, November). Global Capability Center (GCC) transformation capabilities in India – PEAK Matrix® assessment 2025: Focus on HCLTech.
https://www.hcltech.com/sites/default/files/documents/analyst-reports/files/2025/11/25/Everest-Group-GCC-Transformation-Capabilities.pdf

[3] (also cited as [14], [49], [74])
Accenture & Everest Group. (2024). Global in-house center (GIC) setup capabilities in India – Provider PEAK Matrix® assessment 2024.
https://www.accenture.com/content/dam/accenture/final/accenture-com/document-3/Accenture-Everest-Group-Global-In-house-Center-GIC-Setup-Capabilities-in-India-Provider-PEAK-Matrix-Assessment-2024.pdf

[4] (also cited as [20], [24], [37])
Zinnov. (2024). India GCC landscape: The 5-year report 2024.
https://media.zinnov.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/zinnov-india-gcc-landscape-the-5-year-report-2024.pdf

[5] (also cited as [25], [36], [54], [65], [66], [67])
Reuters. (2025, July 21). U.S. retail giant Costco to set up global capability centre in India, employ 1,000 people.
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/us-retail-giant-costco-set-up-global-capability-centre-india-employ-1000-people-2025-07-21/

[6] (also cited as [52])
IBPAP. (n.d.). Newsroom.
https://ibpap.org/news-room/35

[7] (also cited as [26], [32], [34], [42], [43], [53], [55], [76], [84], [86])
IBPAP. (n.d.). Industry roadmap / hub resource report.
https://admin.ibpap.org/storage/hub-resources/1fntWJGQKvZg4CfwP4yfXs0Jr1n85DVR1vYXJvSn.pdf

[8] (also cited as [40], [79])
World Economic Forum. (2025). Future of jobs report 2025.
https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_Report_2025.pdf

[9] (also cited as [70], [77], [82])
PwC Philippines. (2024). Tax Alert No. 44 – CREATE MORE.
https://www.pwc.com/ph/en/tax/tax-alerts/2024/pwcph-tax-alert-44-create-more.pdf

[10]
Accenture. (n.d.). What is a global capability center?
https://www.accenture.com/us-en/insights/what-is-global-capability-center

[12]
KPMG. (n.d.). Shared service center or outsourcing?
https://kpmg.com/ch/en/insights/transformation/shared-service-center-or-outsourcing.html

[13]
Everest Group. (n.d.). Why GCC brand perception matters and what you can do about it.
https://www.everestgrp.com/blog/why-gcc-brand-perception-matters-and-what-can-you-do-about-it-blog.html

[17] (also cited as [50])
Everest Group. (n.d.). Getting the setup right: The early “aha” moments that define GCC success.
https://www.everestgrp.com/blog/getting-the-setup-right-the-early-aha-moments-that-can-define-gcc-success-blog.html

[21] (also cited as [23], [38], [47], [61])
EY. (2023). GCC pulse survey 2023.
https://www.ey.com/content/dam/ey-unified-site/ey-com/en-in/services/consulting/global-capability-centers/documents/ey-gcc-pulse-survey-2023-v1.pdf

[22]
Everest Group. (n.d.). How global capability centers are driving transformation: The evolving landscape.
https://www.everestgrp.com/how-global-capability-centers-are-driving-transformation-the-evolving-landscape-blog/

[27] (also cited as [41], [45], [48])
AMRO Asia. (n.d.). Can the Philippines IT-BPM industry stay ahead amid the AI wave?
https://amro-asia.org/can-the-philippines-it-bpm-industry-stay-ahead-amid-the-ai-wave

[28]
Kearney. (2023). Global services location index 2023.
https://www.kearney.com/about/kearney-in-the-media/press/article/-/insights/kearney-releases-2023-global-services-location-index

[29]
Bernama. (n.d.). News article.
https://bernama.com/en/news.php?id=2458952

[30] (also cited as [81])
Invest Vietnam. (n.d.). HCM City emerges as top destination for next-generation global capability centres.
https://investvietnam.vn/hcm-city-emerges-as-top-destination-for-next-generation-global-capability-centres-n3712.html

[31] (also cited as [68], [69])
Deutsche Bank. (n.d.). The rise of global capability centres in APAC.
https://flow.db.com/topics/macro-and-markets/the-rise-of-global-capability-centres-in-apac

[33]
JLL. (2024). BFSI guide: Record 134M sq ft leased in 2024.
https://www.jll.com/en-in/newsroom/jll-bfsi-guide-record-134m-sq-ft-leased-in-2024

[35] (also cited as [56], [57])
BusinessMirror. (2022, December 1). Boehringer Ingelheim wants to expand workforce in PH.
https://businessmirror.com.ph/2022/12/01/boehringer-ingelheim-wantsto-expand-workforce-in-phl/

[39] (also cited as [83])
World Economic Forum. (2025). AI jobs and International Workers’ Day.
https://www.weforum.org/stories/2025/04/ai-jobs-international-workers-day/

[44] (also cited as [80])
JobStreet Philippines. (n.d.). Customer service representative salary guide.
https://ph.jobstreet.com/career-advice/role/customer-service-representative-csr/salary

[46] (also cited as [75])
iScale Solutions. (n.d.). Average salary in the Philippines.
https://iscale-solutions.com/average-salary-in-the-philippines/

[59] (also cited as [60])
Airbnb. (n.d.). New Bengaluru tech hub to be part of Airbnb’s ongoing investment in India.
https://news.airbnb.com/en-in/new-bengaluru-tech-hub-to-be-part-of-airbnbs-ongoing-investment-in-india/

[62] (also cited as [64])
Henkel. (2022, May 4). Henkel opens new global technology center in India.
https://www.henkel.com/press-and-media/press-releases-and-kits/2022-05-04-henkel-opens-new-global-technology-center-in-india-1661374

[63]
Henkel. (2023, January 31). Seizing the opportunities of change.
https://www.henkel.com/spotlight/2023-01-31-seizing-the-opportunities-of-change-1799872

[71]
Business Inquirer. (n.d.). PEZA rule on 50% remote work out soon.
https://business.inquirer.net/525425/peza-rule-on-50-remote-work-out-soon

[72] (also cited as [78], [85])
National Privacy Commission. (n.d.). Data Privacy Act of 2012.
https://privacy.gov.ph/data-privacy-act/

[73]
Reuters. (2025, October 15). Meet AI chatbots replacing India’s call center workers.
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/meet-ai-chatbots-replacing-indias-call-center-workers-2025-10-15/